Przejdź do głównej zawartości

TIP THE BALANCE


Digital literacy - the term i didn’t even know before joining ONLcourse will be the keynote of my first post. Since I perceive myself as a rather analytical mind I pretty much like this definition:

digital literacy = digital tool knowledge + critical thinking + social engagement” [1]

During the first weeks of the course i've also learnt about different theories on how people are able to develop their digital literacies and behave in the digital world. I must say that until now, i had been an involuntary follower of M. Prensky theory [2]. After deeper reflection, the idea of digital natives, who absorb digital technologies all their lives and theoretically should be better in using them, seem irrelevant to me. Some studies showed that the concept of digital native has no direct translation to higher education, since e.g. students born after 1984 use digital technologies, but only few from the wide range of possibilities [3]. The theory of visitors and residents created by D.S White and A. Le Cornu appears to be more convincing to me [4].

While taking the course on digital tools in learning and teaching, it seems like a good idea, to reflect at the beginning of it, on my place in the digital world. Apart from very basic knowledge on Microsoft Office I gained at secondary school, my digital presence started simultaneously in professional activities (usage of oceanographic databases) and personal life - music addict (last.fm, myspace). Where am I after several years that have passed...


It looks that I’m still more a vistor than a resident, however, this blog and first of all the ONL, may tip the balance.

Because of the participation in ONL course,  i’ve started to think about some topics that are inseparable with digital literacy and didn’t bother me so much before, e.g. how to find free-to-use images/videos etc.? how to depersonalize google search? what kind of digital footprints do i leave ?  While searching for materials needed to prepare the lectures, i really appreciate the small things, the details and hard to find in the articles 'know how' solutions, that i can discover on thematic, scientific blogs. In the end of TOPIC 1 of ONL course i finish with the question - shouldn't I start being more a resident than a visitor and share my knowledge?



References:

2. Prensky M. 2001, Digital natives digital immigrants. On the Horizon NCB University Press, 95(5), 1-6.
3. Margaryan A., Littlejohn A., Vojt G. 2011, Are digital natives myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies. Computers and Education, 56, 429-440.
4.White D.S., Le Cornu A. 2011, Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday, 16(9)

Komentarze

  1. Good day,
    I really identified with you in this blog, as I also see myself as more a visitor than a resident. Yet I work daily with computers and on the internet, but my interaction is still either in person or on the phone. A very interesting article by Prensky. Thanks.

    Doulette

    OdpowiedzUsuń
    Odpowiedzi
    1. Are You more a resident after the course Doulette? I feel like I am ;)

      Usuń

Prześlij komentarz

Popularne posty z tego bloga

Collaboration mode - on

Image retreived from Pixabay under  CC0   licence From very early days of our life we are learning…we are learning independently by trials and errors. I cannot count how many times I’ve heard from my 2-years old son „no, no, no, don’t help me, I want to do it by myself”. By learning from others, by getting ready-made solutions, I guess we lost some part of our innate creativity. But there is no other way. By living in society, small children start to absorb  information at an exponential rate. So we, as the teachers, must learn how to teach wisely to protect/strengthen our students critical thinking and how to show our students that balanced collaboration can be so powerful. A key issue to start with is the importance of getting to know each other, when working in the group. I noticed that that in standard classroom, Students are really sensitive on whether I remember all of their names. Sometimes it’s hard with large groups, but it’s worth to find a way to memorize them. So

The productive blend

Image retreived from Pixabay under  CC0   licence The topic 4 from ONL course raised up lively discussion in our PBL13 group. All of us had some slightly different ideas of what blended learning actually is. Similarly, if we look through the literature, we can find many ambiguous definitions. The one that appealed to me the most, was quoted by Driscoll (2002): blended learning is - “To combine various pedagogical approaches…to produce an optimal learning outcome…”. So, the cycle of blended learning does not necessarily incorporate digital tools, however, web-based technology is often inseparably identified with this way of learning. That was the first surprise. I guess the other was, that when we took a look at our teaching methods used so far, it turned out that all of us use different models of blended learning! We just didn’t know that at the time. I don’t need being convinced, that blended learning is beneficial. But for the doubtful ones I gathered two examples fro

OER?

Image retreived from MaxPixel under CC0 licence Among many important issues that we have considered under the topic 2 (ONL Course) , my particular interest was raised by Open Educational Resources (OER) of which I had a very vague idea before. What are OER: "teaching, learning or research materials that are in the public domain or released with an intellectual property license that allows for free use, adaptation and distribution" [1]. I like this idea very much. Why...? Something that stayed in my mind after revising this topic, are our Moderator's words: How much from what you wrote/created during your work was actually made only of your original thoughts? Well, very little...so why not to share? Of course, like with every breakthrough concept, there are some controversies, sensitive problems (e.g. whether to share someone's "know how", how to protect materials from improper/dishonest usage, the quality of prepared materials, credibility issues).